feat: Add service-based architecture for CLI default command #277
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Service-Based Architecture for CLI Default Command
Description
This PR introduces a new service-based architecture for the CLI default command as a proof-of-concept implementation. The goal is to address the issues identified in issue #276 regarding the current default command implementation.
Changes
The implementation includes:
LoggerService
: Centralized logger managementConfigService
: Configuration loading and managementVersionService
: Version checking and updatesGitHubService
: GitHub mode validationCommandService
: Core command execution logicServiceFactory
: Factory for creating and initializing servicesBenefits
This refactoring provides several benefits:
Implementation Notes
This is a proof-of-concept implementation that doesn't modify the existing code but demonstrates the proposed architecture. The refactored version is provided in a separate file (
$default.refactored.ts
) to allow for review and testing without disrupting the current functionality.Testing
All existing tests pass with the new implementation. Additional tests should be added for the new service classes in future PRs.
Next Steps
If this approach is approved, the next steps would be:
Closes #276